Synthetic fair-lending evidence review

One question. One evidence packet. Ten business days.

Test whether Avarent produces evidence your compliance and model-risk teams can challenge and use, without replacing the decision model or beginning with production integration.

Inspect the sample outputScope one question
ScopeOne workflow and one agreed evaluation question.
DeliveryEvidence packet and readout within 10 business days of accepted inputs.
Founding evaluation terms$2,500 fixed during Avarent’s initial institutional evaluation period. Half at scope acceptance and half at delivery.
Review termsWhat happensScope and deliverablesSuccess criteriaScope a question

A finite review, with an exit at each stage.

  1. 01

    Scope the question

    In a no-charge conversation, define one workflow, outcome, population, comparison, time window, and useful decision. Avarent returns the proposed method, minimum inputs, exclusions, and success criteria before requesting data or payment.

    Exit condition: the question or method is not a fit.
  2. 02

    Run the evidence review

    Use one synthetic or institution-approved de-identified extract. Avarent documents the configuration, reproduces the agreed measures, records findings, and makes limitations visible.

    Exit condition: the inputs are unsuitable or the output is not reproducible.
  3. 03

    Deliver and decide

    Receive the evidence packet, agreed exports, and a 45-minute stakeholder readout. Your team decides whether a limited next-stage pilot is justified.

    Exit condition: delivery completes the review; expansion is never automatic.

Scope and deliverables

InputsOne agreed tabular extract, data dictionary, outcome definition, comparison cohorts, and time window
Starting dataSynthetic or institution-approved de-identified data
DeliverablesConfiguration note, disparity screen, finding record, limitations, evidence packet, export, and stakeholder readout
Production integrationNot included or required
Decision authorityRemains with the institution
Commercial terms$2,500 fixed; 50% at written scope acceptance and 50% at delivery
Public referenceNever assumed; separate written permission is required

Success is observable, not rhetorical.

Before work begins, choose two or three tests: reproduce one baseline measure within an agreed tolerance; trace each finding to its population and configuration; export a packet a qualified reviewer can challenge; or identify a known limitation clearly. “Become compliant,” “eliminate bias,” and “receive regulatory approval” are not valid success criteria.

Scope one evaluation question

No data belongs in this form. A founder will respond with the proposed boundary, required inputs, deliverables, exclusions, and next decision.

No newsletter or automated sequence. No production data belongs in this form.